Posts Mentioning RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Andy P 5:17 pm on April 19, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

     
    • minikperi 7:46 am on April 20, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      Cool blog

      I hope everybody read this article

      thank you for infos

    • Mehul Hirani 5:46 pm on April 20, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      Congratulations on having the opportunity to participate in Smashing Magazine’s article. I’ve had a good read of the article, and yes I agree, it’s an interesting and insightful read, but most importantly a great resource for designers like myself. Great post!

      Mehul

    • Howtobewebsmart 7:10 pm on May 9, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      I’m not sure if I put this elsewhere on the site, but here is the durable theme widget ready: http://howtobewebsmart.com/durablewr

    • Web Contempo 8:41 pm on May 21, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      Great job getting the first slot. Smashing mag is the best of the best and you do great work.

  • Andy P 5:56 pm on April 15, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Finder Interface

    Full Size Version

     

    1. The iTunes Look & Feel

    When iTunes 7 was released, along came another new interface. However, this time there had been a lot more thought put in. There were new widgets, new colors, and a distinct lack of “Aqua”.

    My personal opinion, and that of many Mac enthusiasts, is this will start the transition. A transition away from the jelly bean, “reflections everywhere” look and feel that has been with OS X since day one. I think we will see this look and feel (or at least some sort of variation of it) across the board in Leopard.

    2. Tabs Tabs Tabs

    Tabs are something that Finder has been crying out for for a long time. When tabs exploded onto the browser scene a few years back, people took time to adjust to having multiple layers in one window. I think most people now find it hard to live without them. Tabs help stop window clutter and make it simple to see all of the locations you have open at one time.

    I think Apple would be crazy to leave tabs out of a new Finder application.

    3. Bread-crumb Navigation

    This is something I would personally love to see. A Finder bread-crumb would represent a history of where you’ve been, rather than just a simple folder hierarchy. This would tie in nicely to the back and forward buttons, but also allow you the freedom of jumping to any point in the history. This may well break interface guidelines however, as it differs from the way it works in iTunes, so it’s probably a long shot.

    4. Multi Views

    Smart folders are great, I make them, use them for five minutes, and then forget about them.

    What if Apple came up with some pre-made smart folders that would appear in a section at the top of each finder window? Most of the time I’m opening finder if get hold of a file I’ve edited pretty recently. If Finder presented me with my last five edited files, this would be a big time saver.

    Apple could create other options such as “files with a red color label” or “files less than 5mb”. All this functionality already exists through smart folders. I’m just making it more useful for the average user.

    5. Smart Folder / Burn Folder Button

    Following on from before, smart folders and burn folders are hidden up in the “File” menu. Why not bring this into view by using a “cog” button on the main finder window?

    6. New Folder Icons

    Along with the new look and feel, I think we will see new folder icons. The current ones are very “pinstriped” and look dated. Maybe we will see folder icons along the same style as the new Adobe CS3 folder icons?

    What are you thoughts on a new Finder?

     
    • Parker 10:28 am on April 16, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      You know, it’s something I haven’t previously given much thought to, but you propose some solid ideas. I like that they don’t radically change anything that we’re already used to, and simply incorporate things we already know from common apps like iTunes. In all honesty, I’ve been apathetic about Leopard… but if it brings smart thinking like your suggestions, I’m beginning to get excited about it.

    • Sebastiaan de With 11:51 am on April 16, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      Hey, I think you’ve done a very decent mockup. It’s actually the only somewhat realistic and logical mockup of the Finder interface I have seen to date. Some of your suggestions are also quite clever, although I don’t know if they will make it into Leopard – like you said. The folder icons are a bit non-Mac, though ;)

    • Oxi Metoxi 10:57 am on April 21, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      Hey!
      Lovely Finder window! I really hope it looks something like that.
      But in the meantime. Do you know a utility which makes tabs in the finder possible?
      Ola.

    • Jeroen 4:44 pm on May 14, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      Great design. Well done!

      [quote]This is something I would personally love to see. A Finder bread-crumb would represent a history of where you’ve been, rather than just a simple folder hierarchy. This would tie in nicely to the back and forward buttons, [/quote]

      Noooo! That would be terrible. The back and forward buttons are for history purposes, a breadcrumb navigation symbolises hierarchy. Why turn the breadcrumb navigation into something inconsistent and redundant?

      In every application, including iTunes and several websites, it represents how deep you are in the hierarchy.

      Further, if it would represent history navigation, it wouldn’t be very handy to drop files onto.
      With a “real” breadcrumb navigation I can imagine it would be easy to drop files onto parent folders by releasing it somewhere on the breadcrumb navigation bar.

    • Red 6:16 pm on May 17, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      I want spatial navigation… Tabs are for web browsers.

    • Joe 2:37 am on June 21, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      You weren’t too far off :)

    • Sean 12:30 am on October 21, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      Wow… so close! To be honest, I like yours better! Tabs would rock my socks. (And of course, your sidebar is so much prettier.) Kudos, on an awesome, useful-looking mockup, and for almost nailing the real Leopard finder! Hopefully 10.6 looks just like yours.

    • ben 12:16 pm on August 12, 2008 Permalink | Reply

      What I need for apple to do is to add ’sort by date added’ to finder windows. I can sort stacks so that most recently added to the folder items are at the bottom, but not finder windows.

    • radScientist 4:34 pm on August 14, 2008 Permalink | Reply

      The leopard finder does have breadcrumb navigation… Go to the finder, click the View menu, then click “show path bar”…

      Or if you want a really killer feature, just control/right click on the finders windows Title

  • Andy P 2:34 pm on April 11, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Personally, since reading the book and even before that, I’ve made programming flexible and scalable (aka bulletproof) designs one of my top priorities.

    The only trouble is I find it takes a whole lot longer to program something to be bulletproof, than it does just to whip it up the old fashioned way. It’s absolutely worth it, but it’s a lot more fiddling with images and extra markup in any case, which takes time.

    Now, the aim for many of these bulletproof techniques is to keep your site design together when the browsers text is resized. Take a look at Dan’s site and resize the text in Firefox as an example of a great bulletproof design (he is the author after all!).

    If you have a copy of IE7 installed, try bringing up Dan’s site and resizing the text again in there. See the difference?

    IE7 has taken on something called “page zoom” which basically resizes everything on the page in unison. The first time I saw this was in Opera, and it’s a really nice feature. So instead of the text on your page bursting at the design seams when it’s resized, all the containing boxes and graphics will also resize at the same time.

    When Opera was the only browser using page zoom it didn’t really matter, as Opera only counts for a very small percentage of users. Now that IE7 is using page zoom, it becomes a very different matter. We may end up with 70-80% of web users with page zoom as their default behavior.

    If Firefox chipped into that, and switched to page zoom in their next version, we’re looking at perhaps 95% of internet users with page zoom instead of simple text resizing.

    If that becomes the case, then would it be right to say that it’s pointless to do the extra work to make your designs bulletproof for text resizing? I personally think so.

    Maybe I’m getting ahead of myself a little, it’ll take some time before IE7 picks up and overtakes IE6 as the major player. Its numbers however are moving fast thanks to the Windows automatic updates feature (and the fact IE6 is a security train wreck). IE7’s page zoom is also not up to the standard of Opera’s just yet.

    So for now at least, I’m continuing with the good practice of bulletproofing for text resizing. I’m sure however, that in the next year or so, the practice will become close to redundant. Then we can all relax knowing that our sites will look great at any size.

    At least, until we start talking about resolution independence. ;)

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel